[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":284},["ShallowReactive",2],{"post-\u002Fposts\u002Fslow-writing":3,"post-nav-\u002Fposts\u002Fslow-writing":247,"post-related-\u002Fposts\u002Fslow-writing":267},{"id":4,"title":5,"body":6,"category":232,"cover":233,"date":234,"description":235,"draft":236,"extension":237,"featured":236,"meta":238,"navigation":239,"path":240,"pinned":236,"seo":241,"stem":242,"tags":243,"updated":233,"__hash__":246},"posts\u002Fposts\u002Fslow-writing.md","慢下来之后我才开始写得下去",{"type":7,"value":8,"toc":217},"minimark",[9,18,21,24,27,33,37,45,48,67,70,73,79,82,87,90,93,100,106,109,112,117,120,125,128,131,134,138,141,144,148,151,154,160,164,167,170,173,176,182,185,188,194,197,203,206,211,214],[10,11,12,13,17],"p",{},"有很长一段时间，我以为自己写不出东西是因为",[14,15,16],"strong",{},"工具不够好","。",[10,19,20],{},"于是换编辑器：Sublime → VS Code → Obsidian → Typora → 又回到 VS Code。",[10,22,23],{},"换笔记系统：印象笔记 → Notion → Roam → Logseq → 纯 markdown 文件夹。",[10,25,26],{},"换写作方法：卡片笔记法、Zettelkasten、番茄钟、晨间日记。",[10,28,29,30,17],{},"三年过去，公开发布的文章：",[14,31,32],{},"4 篇",[34,35,36],"h2",{"id":36},"转折点",[10,38,39,40,44],{},"去年年底我清电脑，翻到一个 2019 年的文件夹，里面躺着 37 个 ",[41,42,43],"code",{},".md"," 文件。",[10,46,47],{},"标题都是这样的：",[49,50,51,57,62],"ul",{},[52,53,54],"li",{},[41,55,56],{},"关于性能优化的一些想法.md",[52,58,59],{},[41,60,61],{},"重构的时机.md",[52,63,64],{},[41,65,66],{},"为什么我不喜欢 TypeScript.md",[10,68,69],{},"每个文件打开都是 200 字左右，写到一半停住。",[10,71,72],{},"那 200 字都不差。它们没写完的原因不是写得不好，是我在写的过程中不断问自己：",[74,75,76],"blockquote",{},[10,77,78],{},"这篇有价值吗？别人会不会觉得太浅？这个观点是不是早就有人写过？",[10,80,81],{},"然后我就去搜，去对比，去补充，去重写开头。",[10,83,84],{},[14,85,86],{},"一篇文章的写作时间，80% 花在自我怀疑上。",[34,88,89],{"id":89},"我改了什么",[10,91,92],{},"不是换了工具，是换了标准。",[10,94,95,96,99],{},"以前的标准：这篇文章要提供",[14,97,98],{},"新的、完整的、正确的","见解。",[10,101,102,103,17],{},"现在的标准：这篇文章要让我自己",[14,104,105],{},"三个月后还能看懂我当时在想什么",[10,107,108],{},"这个转变带来的直接后果是：不再追求全面。",[10,110,111],{},"一篇讲「暗色模式」的文章，我不再试图覆盖所有情况（品牌色怎么办、图片怎么处理、打印样式怎么办）。我只写我自己踩过的那三个坑。",[10,113,114],{},[14,115,116],{},"不完整，但真实。",[34,118,119],{"id":119},"具体做法",[121,122,124],"h3",{"id":123},"一先写正文最后写标题","一、先写正文，最后写标题",[10,126,127],{},"标题是最容易卡住的地方，因为它要同时满足\"准确\"和\"吸引人\"。",[10,129,130],{},"所以我现在先写正文，写完再回头看这篇到底在说什么，标题自然就有了。",[10,132,133],{},"有时候标题会变成一句正文里的话。",[121,135,137],{"id":136},"二允许文章短","二、允许文章短",[10,139,140],{},"我有一篇只有 400 字。它讲了一个很小的 CSS 技巧。",[10,142,143],{},"如果按以前的标准，这个长度不值得发。现在我觉得：如果这 400 字能省下别人 20 分钟试错，它就值得存在。",[121,145,147],{"id":146},"三不修改超过两遍","三、不修改超过两遍",[10,149,150],{},"第一遍写完，放一天，第二遍通读改错别字和逻辑断层。",[10,152,153],{},"然后发。",[10,155,156,159],{},[14,157,158],{},"不再有第三遍。"," 第三遍开始就是自我怀疑的循环了。",[121,161,163],{"id":162},"四公开发布而不是攒着","四、公开发布，而不是攒着",[10,165,166],{},"攒稿的诱惑很大：「等我攒够十篇再一起发，显得专业一点。」",[10,168,169],{},"但攒稿的结果通常是：攒到第三篇就停了，因为看不到反馈。",[10,171,172],{},"发出去之后，哪怕只有一个人读，那种\"有人看了\"的感觉会推着写下一篇。",[34,174,175],{"id":175},"现在的状态",[10,177,178,179,17],{},"从去年年底到现在，8 个月，写了 ",[14,180,181],{},"23 篇",[10,183,184],{},"没有一篇是\"完美\"的。有几篇我现在回头看觉得观点太幼稚。有一篇甚至有个技术错误（后来在评论区被指出来了）。",[10,186,187],{},"但 23 篇 > 4 篇。",[10,189,190,191],{},"而且我发现一件有意思的事：",[14,192,193],{},"写得越多，写得越快。",[10,195,196],{},"第一篇花了三个周末。最近一篇花了一个晚上。",[10,198,199,200,17],{},"不是因为变厉害了，是因为",[14,201,202],{},"不再为\"写得不够好\"而停下来",[34,204,205],{"id":205},"一句话",[74,207,208],{},[10,209,210],{},"写作的敌人不是没灵感，是完美主义。",[10,212,213],{},"完美主义让你在第一个段落就反复推敲，然后永远到不了第二段。",[10,215,216],{},"放弃完美，先写完，再改。这是唯一有效的方法。",{"title":218,"searchDepth":219,"depth":219,"links":220},"",2,[221,222,223,230,231],{"id":36,"depth":219,"text":36},{"id":89,"depth":219,"text":89},{"id":119,"depth":219,"text":119,"children":224},[225,227,228,229],{"id":123,"depth":226,"text":124},3,{"id":136,"depth":226,"text":137},{"id":146,"depth":226,"text":147},{"id":162,"depth":226,"text":163},{"id":175,"depth":219,"text":175},{"id":205,"depth":219,"text":205},"随笔",null,"2025-06-18","追求\"高效写作\"的那几年，我一篇文章都没写完。放弃效率之后，反而写了几十篇。",false,"md",{},true,"\u002Fposts\u002Fslow-writing",{"title":5,"description":235},"posts\u002Fslow-writing",[244,245],"写作","反思","osshOQKwdKVIsDFK4V2zOxH2LJaZx61p0jGc-hxfAD4",{"prev":248,"next":258},{"path":249,"title":250,"description":251,"date":252,"updated":233,"tags":253,"category":255,"cover":257,"draft":236,"pinned":239,"featured":236},"\u002Fposts\u002Ftypography-over-color","排版比配色更决定气质","把同样一套颜色交给两个人排，出来的东西可以完全不同。这篇讲我怎么用字重、行距和留白，在不换颜色的前提下改变一个页面的脾气。","2025-10-28",[254,255,256],"排版","设计","CSS","\u002Fimages\u002Fcovers\u002Ftypography.png",{"path":259,"title":260,"description":261,"date":262,"updated":233,"tags":263,"category":255,"cover":233,"draft":236,"pinned":236,"featured":236},"\u002Fposts\u002Fmobile-first-375","写给 375px 的界面","移动端不是缩小版桌面。底部 Tab 栏、可达的拇指区、iOS 安全区——这些细节决定了移动端体验的下限。","2025-06-02",[264,265,266],"响应式","移动端","交互",[268,277],{"path":269,"title":270,"description":271,"date":272,"updated":233,"tags":273,"category":276,"cover":233,"draft":236,"pinned":236,"featured":236},"\u002Fposts\u002Fdeleted-90-percent","我删掉了站点的 90% 功能","一个博客需要什么？列表、文章、归档、搜索、订阅。其他东西我全删了，然后发现加载时间从 2.3 秒掉到了 380 毫秒。","2025-10-12",[274,275,245],"性能","架构","工程",{"path":278,"title":279,"description":280,"date":281,"updated":233,"tags":282,"category":255,"cover":233,"draft":236,"pinned":236,"featured":236},"\u002Fposts\u002Fstop-using-cards","别再用卡片装一切","卡片是个好东西，但它有明确的使用条件。当每一块内容都变成同样圆角同样阴影的卡片时，页面就失去了层级，读者也失去了方向。","2025-08-22",[255,283,245],"布局",1794113902309]